↓ Skip to main content

The Use of TB-Specific Antigen/Phytohemagglutinin Ratio for Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Use of TB-Specific Antigen/Phytohemagglutinin Ratio for Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng Wang, Jing Yu, Yu Zhou, Ying Luo, Shiji Wu, Min Huang, Botao Yin, Jing Huang, Liyan Mao, Ziyong Sun

Abstract

Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) has become more common in recent years; however, the diagnosis of EPTB remains a challenge. In this study, we analyzed the performance of the ratio of TB-specific antigen (TBAg) to phytohemagglutinin (PHA) (TBAg/PHA ratio) in T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) assay for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of EPTB. Between 2012 and 2017, 734 EPTB patients were diagnosed and recruited from Tongji hospital, and 1,137 suspected EPTB patients who had other diagnoses were recruited as non-EPTB controls. To validate the study, another small group of EPTB patients and non-EPTB controls were recruited from Sino-French New City Branch of Tongji Hospital. The positive rate of peripheral blood T-SPOT in EPTB and non-EPTB were 88.15 and 32.28%. In T-SPOT positive patients, the direct T-SPOT results had limited value in distinguishing these two conditions. A further calculation of the TBAg/PHA ratio of T-SPOT showed improved performance in each form of EPTB. If using 0.20 as the threshold value of the TBAg/PHA ratio, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 70.79 and 91.55% in distinguishing EPTB from non-EPTB. The validation results showed a better performance of the TBAg/PHA ratio in distinguishing these two conditions, with a sensitivity and specificity of 81.82 and 97.56%, respectively. Comparing with directly using T-SPOT results, the TBAg/PHA ratio was less affected by immunosuppression. Furthermore, PHA value reflected immunosuppression and could help to judge the credibility of T-SPOT results in EPTB patients with different immune status. The TBAg/PHA ratio was significantly decreased during anti-tuberculosis (TB) treatment, which suggests that it can also be used to monitor therapeutic efficacy. These data provide new insights into the role of T-SPOT assay in TB disease, and the TBAg/PHA ratio might be a useful tool for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of EPTB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Linguistics 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#22,889,200
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#27,715
of 31,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,281
of 341,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#679
of 744 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 744 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.