↓ Skip to main content

Is Receptor-Interacting Protein Kinase 3 a Viable Therapeutic Target for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Receptor-Interacting Protein Kinase 3 a Viable Therapeutic Target for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection?
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael D. Stutz, Samar Ojaimi, Gregor Ebert, Marc Pellegrini

Abstract

The dwindling list of antimicrobial agents exhibiting broad efficacy against clinical strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) has forced the medical community to redefine current approaches to the treatment of tuberculosis (TB). Host receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3) has been flagged recently as a potential target, given that it is believed to regulate necroptosis-independent signaling pathways, which have been implicated in exacerbating several inflammatory conditions and which reportedly play a role in the necrosis of Mtb-infected macrophages. To examine the therapeutic potential of inhibiting RIPK3, we infected RIPK3-deficient mice with aerosolized Mtb. We found that the loss of RIPK3 did not alter overall disease outcomes, with deficient animals harboring similar bacterial numbers in the lungs and spleens compared to their wild-type counterparts. Mtb-infected macrophages were not rescued from dying by Ripk3 deletion, nor did this affect production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β, both in vitro and in vivo. Infiltration of immune cells into the lungs, as well as the activation of adaptive immunity, similarly was not overtly affected by the loss of RIPK3 signaling. Collectively, our data argue against a role of RIPK3 in mediating pathological inflammation or macrophage necrosis during Mtb disease pathogenesis and thus suggest that this host protein is unlikely to be an attractive therapeutic target for TB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#16,721
of 31,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,069
of 344,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#480
of 748 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 748 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.