↓ Skip to main content

Circulating T Cell Subpopulations Correlate With Immune Responses at the Tumor Site and Clinical Response to PD1 Inhibition in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circulating T Cell Subpopulations Correlate With Immune Responses at the Tumor Site and Clinical Response to PD1 Inhibition in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01613
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nataly Manjarrez-Orduño, Laurence C. Menard, Selena Kansal, Paul Fischer, Bijal Kakrecha, Can Jiang, Mark Cunningham, Danielle Greenawalt, Vishal Patel, Minghui Yang, Ryan Golhar, Julie A. Carman, Sergey Lezhnin, Hongyue Dai, Paul S. Kayne, Suzanne J. Suchard, Steven H. Bernstein, Steven G. Nadler

Abstract

Agents targeting the PD1-PDL1 axis have transformed cancer therapy. Factors that influence clinical response to PD1-PDL1 inhibitors include tumor mutational burden, immune infiltration of the tumor, and local PDL1 expression. To identify peripheral correlates of the anti-tumor immune response in the absence of checkpoint blockade, we performed a retrospective study of circulating T cell subpopulations and matched tumor gene expression in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Notably, both melanoma and NSCLC patients whose tumors exhibited increased inflammatory gene transcripts presented high CD4+ and CD8+ central memory T cell (CM) to effector T cell (Eff) ratios in blood. Consequently, we evaluated CM/Eff T cell ratios in a second cohort of NSCLC. The data showed that high CM/Eff T cell ratios correlated with increased tumor PDL1 expression. Furthermore, of the 22 patients within this NSCLC cohort who received nivolumab, those with high CM/Eff T cell ratios, had longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median survival: 91 vs. 215 days). These findings show that by providing a window into the state of the immune system, peripheral T cell subpopulations inform about the state of the anti-tumor immune response and identify potential blood biomarkers of clinical response to checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma and NSCLC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 26%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Other 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 37 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 48 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#20,310
of 31,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,148
of 341,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#443
of 616 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 616 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.