You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emerging Developments in Microbiome and Microglia Research: Implications for Neurodevelopmental Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01993 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yeonwoo Lebovitz, Veronica M. Ringel-Scaia, Irving C. Allen, Michelle H. Theus |
| Abstract |
From immunology to neuroscience, interactions between the microbiome and host are increasingly appreciated as potent drivers of health and disease. Epidemiological studies previously identified compelling correlations between perinatal microbiome insults and neurobehavioral outcomes, the mechanistic details of which are just beginning to take shape thanks to germ-free and antibiotics-based animal models. This review summarizes parallel developments from clinical and preclinical research that suggest neuroactive roles for gut bacteria and their metabolites. We also examine the nascent field of microbiome-microglia crosstalk research, which includes pharmacological and genetic strategies to inform functional capabilities of microglia in response to microbial programming. Finally, we address an emerging hypothesis behind neurodevelopmental disorders, which implicates microbiome dysbiosis in the atypical programming of neuroimmune cells, namely microglia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 75% |
| Scientists | 10 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 158 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 21 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 11% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 58 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#963,659
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#848
of 32,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,208
of 346,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#26
of 646 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 646 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.