↓ Skip to main content

NKG2D Ligands–Critical Targets for Cancer Immune Escape and Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NKG2D Ligands–Critical Targets for Cancer Immune Escape and Therapy
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominik Schmiedel, Ofer Mandelboim

Abstract

DNA damage, oncogene activation and excessive proliferation, chromatin modulations or oxidative stress are all important hallmarks of cancer. Interestingly, all of these abnormalities also induce a cellular stress response. By upregulating "stress-induced ligands," damaged or transformed cells can be recognized by immune cells and cleared. The human genome encodes eight functional "stress-induced ligands": MICA, MICB, and ULBP1-6. All of them are recognized by a single receptor, NKG2D, which is expressed on natural killer (NK) cells, cytotoxic T cells and other T cell subsets. The NKG2D ligand/NKG2D-axis is well-recognized as an important mediator of anti-tumor activity; however, patient data about the role of NKG2D ligands in immune surveillance and escape appears conflicting. As these ligands are often actively transcribed, tumor cells are urged to manipulate the expression of these ligands on post-transcriptional or post-translational level. Although our knowledge on the regulation of NKG2D ligand expression remains fragmentary, research of the past years revealed multiple cellular mechanisms that are adopted by tumor cells to reduce the expression of "stress-induced ligands" and therefore escape immune recognition. Here, we review the post-transcriptional and post-translational mechanisms by which NKG2D ligands are modulated in cancer cells and their impact on patient prognosis.We discuss controversies and approaches to apply our understanding of the NKG2D ligand/NKG2D-axis for cancer therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 23%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Master 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 52 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 57 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,755,951
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#24,934
of 31,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,052
of 348,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#522
of 639 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 639 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.