↓ Skip to main content

Addressing Profiles of Systemic Inflammation Across the Different Clinical Phenotypes of Acutely Decompensated Cirrhosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Addressing Profiles of Systemic Inflammation Across the Different Clinical Phenotypes of Acutely Decompensated Cirrhosis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00476
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonel Trebicka, Alex Amoros, Carla Pitarch, Esther Titos, José Alcaraz-Quiles, Robert Schierwagen, Carmen Deulofeu, Javier Fernandez-Gomez, Salvatore Piano, Paolo Caraceni, Karl Oettl, Elsa Sola, Wim Laleman, Jane McNaughtan, Rajeshwar P. Mookerjee, Minneke J. Coenraad, Tania Welzel, Christian Steib, Rita Garcia, Thierry Gustot, Miguel A. Rodriguez Gandia, Rafael Bañares, Agustin Albillos, Stefan Zeuzem, Victor Vargas, Faouzi Saliba, Frederic Nevens, Carlo Alessandria, Andrea de Gottardi, Heinz Zoller, Pere Ginès, Tilman Sauerbruch, Alexander Gerbes, Rudolf E. Stauber, Mauro Bernardi, Paolo Angeli, Marco Pavesi, Richard Moreau, Joan Clària, Rajiv Jalan, Vicente Arroyo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Researcher 13 12%
Professor 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 41%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 38 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,821,456
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#4,328
of 32,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,846
of 365,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#133
of 725 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 725 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.