You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantitative Comparison of Conventional and t-SNE-guided Gating Analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01194 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shadi Toghi Eshghi, Amelia Au-Yeung, Chikara Takahashi, Christopher R. Bolen, Maclean N. Nyachienga, Sean P. Lear, Cherie Green, W. Rodney Mathews, William E. O'Gorman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 23% |
| Researcher | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 25 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#16,721
of 31,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,502
of 366,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#402
of 704 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 704 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.