↓ Skip to main content

The Neonatal Fc Receptor (FcRn): A Misnomer?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users
patent
6 patents

Readers on

mendeley
465 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Neonatal Fc Receptor (FcRn): A Misnomer?
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michal Pyzik, Kine M. K. Sand, Jonathan J. Hubbard, Jan Terje Andersen, Inger Sandlie, Richard S. Blumberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 465 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 465 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 15%
Researcher 67 14%
Student > Bachelor 47 10%
Student > Master 40 9%
Other 31 7%
Other 76 16%
Unknown 133 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 96 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 48 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 33 7%
Other 59 13%
Unknown 150 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,799,427
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,649
of 31,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,772
of 360,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#50
of 707 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 707 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.