You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Novel, Five-Marker Alternative to CD16–CD14 Gating to Identify the Three Human Monocyte Subsets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01761 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Siew-Min Ong, Karen Teng, Evan Newell, Hao Chen, Jinmiao Chen, Thomas Loy, Tsin-Wen Yeo, Katja Fink, Siew-Cheng Wong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 19% |
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| South Africa | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 58% |
| Scientists | 21 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 243 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 21% |
| Researcher | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 58 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 56 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 67 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,292,463
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,130
of 32,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,061
of 363,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#35
of 686 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 686 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.