↓ Skip to main content

Tools for Assessing the Protective Efficacy of TB Vaccines in Humans: in vitro Mycobacterial Growth Inhibition Predicts Outcome of in vivo Mycobacterial Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tools for Assessing the Protective Efficacy of TB Vaccines in Humans: in vitro Mycobacterial Growth Inhibition Predicts Outcome of in vivo Mycobacterial Infection
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2020
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02983
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Tanner, Iman Satti, Stephanie A. Harris, Matthew K. O'Shea, Deniz Cizmeci, Daniel O'Connor, Agnieszka Chomka, Magali Matsumiya, Rachel Wittenberg, Angela M. Minassian, Joel Meyer, Helen A. Fletcher, Helen McShane

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 19 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,482,638
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#2,464
of 31,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,831
of 473,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#57
of 603 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 603 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.