↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Efficient Capsid Antigen Presentation From Adeno-Associated Virus Empty Virions In Vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Efficient Capsid Antigen Presentation From Adeno-Associated Virus Empty Virions In Vivo
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03076
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaolei Pei, Lauriel Freya Earley, Yi He, Xiaojing Chen, Nikita Elexa Hall, Richard Jude Samulski, Chengwen Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2020.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#20,310
of 31,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,437
of 469,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#431
of 584 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 584 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.