↓ Skip to main content

A Tissue-Specific Rhythmic Recruitment Pattern of Leukocyte Subsets

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Tissue-Specific Rhythmic Recruitment Pattern of Leukocyte Subsets
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yinglin Yuan, Shengwang Wu, Weiwei Li, Wenyan He

Abstract

The circulating of leukocytes in the vasculature to reach various organs is a crucial step that allows them to perform their function. With a sequence of interaction with the endothelial cells, the leukocytes emigrate from the circulation either by firm attachment to vascular beds or by trafficking into the tissues. Recent findings reveal that the leukocyte recruitment shows time as well as tissue specificity depending on the cell type and homing location. This spatiotemporal distribution of leukocyte subsets is driven by the circadian expression of pro-migratory molecules expressed on the leukocytes and the endothelium. Both the systemic circadian signals and the cell's intrinsic molecule clock contribute to the oscillatory expression of pro-migratory molecules. The rhythmic recruitment of leukocytes plays an important role in the time-dependency of immune responses. It also helps to update blood components and maintain the tissue circadian microenvironment. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge about the mechanisms of the circadian system regulating the leukocyte rhythmic migration, the recruitment pattern of leukocyte subsets into different tissue/organs, and the time-dependent effects behind this process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 7 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 17%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,609,396
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,439
of 31,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,467
of 478,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#33
of 617 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 617 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.