You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Strong CD4 T Cell Responses to Zika Virus Antigens in a Cohort of Dengue Virus Immune Mothers of Congenital Zika Virus Syndrome Infants
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00185 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Catherine J. Reynolds, Patricia Watber, Camilla Natália Oliveira Santos, Danielle Rodrigues Ribeiro, Juliana Cardoso Alves, Adriana B. L. Fonseca, Ana J. B. Bispo, Roseane L. S. Porto, Kalliopi Bokea, Amélia Maria Ribeiro de Jesus, Roque Pacheco de Almeida, Rosemary J. Boyton, Daniel M. Altmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 57% |
Switzerland | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 28 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,063,700
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#9,632
of 32,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,705
of 384,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#276
of 670 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 670 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.