↓ Skip to main content

Differential Expression of IgM and IgD Discriminates Two Subpopulations of Human Circulating IgM+IgD+CD27+ B Cells That Differ Phenotypically, Functionally, and Genetically

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential Expression of IgM and IgD Discriminates Two Subpopulations of Human Circulating IgM+IgD+CD27+ B Cells That Differ Phenotypically, Functionally, and Genetically
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2020
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00736
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana Bautista, Camilo Vásquez, Paola Ayala-Ramírez, Juan Téllez-Sosa, Ernestina Godoy-Lozano, Jesús Martínez-Barnetche, Manuel Franco, Juana Angel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 6 9%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 14 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,224,445
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#3,409
of 31,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,232
of 414,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#115
of 658 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 658 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.