| Title |
Prophylactic Activity of Orally Administered FliD-Reactive Monoclonal SIgA Against Campylobacter Infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa Perruzza, Stefano Jaconi, Gloria Lombardo, Debora Pinna, Francesco Strati, Diego Morone, Frauke Seehusen, Yue Hu, Sakshi Bajoria, Jian Xiong, Ozan Selahattin Kumru, Sangeeta Bagai Joshi, David Bernard Volkin, Renato Piantanida, Fabio Benigni, Fabio Grassi, Davide Corti, Matteo Samuele Pizzuto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 21% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Librarian | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#16,302,945
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#16,830
of 32,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,775
of 435,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#472
of 755 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 755 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.