You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Roles of Inflammation in Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2020.603187 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zheng-Cai Wang, Wan-Yi Zhao, Yangyang Cao, Yan-Qi Liu, Qihang Sun, Peng Shi, Jia-Qin Cai, Xiao Z. Shen, Wei-Qiang Tan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 163 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 89 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 95 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,082,994
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#3,232
of 31,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,117
of 518,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#97
of 697 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 697 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.