You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human Leukocyte Antigen Complex and Other Immunogenetic and Clinical Factors Influence Susceptibility or Protection to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Severity of the Disease Course. The Sardinian Experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2020.605688 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberto Littera, Marcello Campagna, Silvia Deidda, Goffredo Angioni, Selene Cipri, Maurizio Melis, Davide Firinu, Simonetta Santus, Alberto Lai, Rita Porcella, Sara Lai, Stefania Rassu, Rosetta Scioscia, Federico Meloni, Daniele Schirru, William Cordeddu, Marta Anna Kowalik, Maria Serra, Paola Ragatzu, Mauro Giovanni Carta, Stefano Del Giacco, Angelo Restivo, Simona Deidda, Sandro Orrù, Antonella Palimodde, Roberto Perra, Germano Orrù, Maria Conti, Cinzia Balestrieri, Giancarlo Serra, Simona Onali, Francesco Marongiu, Andrea Perra, Luchino Chessa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| Italy | 2 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 155 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 63 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 69 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,411,584
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,235
of 32,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,833
of 529,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#38
of 700 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 700 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.