↓ Skip to main content

Discordance Between the Predicted Versus the Actually Recognized CD8+ T Cell Epitopes of HCMV pp65 Antigen and Aleatory Epitope Dominance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discordance Between the Predicted Versus the Actually Recognized CD8+ T Cell Epitopes of HCMV pp65 Antigen and Aleatory Epitope Dominance
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2021
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2020.618428
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander A. Lehmann, Ting Zhang, Pedro A. Reche, Paul V. Lehmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,526,782
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,866
of 32,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,365
of 543,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#326
of 1,149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 543,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.