You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical, Immunological, and Molecular Features of Severe Combined Immune Deficiency: A Multi-Institutional Experience From India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2020.619146 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pandiarajan Vignesh, Amit Rawat, Rajni Kumrah, Ankita Singh, Anjani Gummadi, Madhubala Sharma, Anit Kaur, Johnson Nameirakpam, Ankur Jindal, Deepti Suri, Anju Gupta, Alka Khadwal, Biman Saikia, Ranjana Walker Minz, Kaushal Sharma, Mukesh Desai, Prasad Taur, Vijaya Gowri, Ambreen Pandrowala, Aparna Dalvi, Neha Jodhawat, Priyanka Kambli, Manisha Rajan Madkaikar, Sagar Bhattad, Stalin Ramprakash, Raghuram Cp, Ananthvikas Jayaram, Meena Sivasankaran, Deenadayalan Munirathnam, Sarath Balaji, Aruna Rajendran, Amita Aggarwal, Komal Singh, Fouzia Na, Biju George, Ankit Mehta, Harsha Prasada Lashkari, Ramya Uppuluri, Revathi Raj, Sandip Bartakke, Kirti Gupta, Sreejesh Sreedharanunni, Yumi Ogura, Tamaki Kato, Kohsuke Imai, Koon Wing Chan, Daniel Leung, Osamu Ohara, Shigeaki Nonoyama, Michael Hershfield, Yu-Lung Lau, Surjit Singh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | 21% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Nepal | 1 | 7% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Librarian | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 30% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,149,685
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#4,435
of 31,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,874
of 532,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#210
of 1,135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.