You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical, Immunological, and Molecular Profile of Chronic Granulomatous Disease: A Multi-Centric Study of 236 Patients From India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2021.625320 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amit Rawat, Pandiarajan Vignesh, Murugan Sudhakar, Madhubala Sharma, Deepti Suri, Ankur Jindal, Anju Gupta, Jitendra Kumar Shandilya, Sathish Kumar Loganathan, Gurjit Kaur, Sanchi Chawla, Pratap Kumar Patra, Alka Khadwal, Biman Saikia, Ranjana Walker Minz, Vaishali Aggarwal, Prasad Taur, Ambreen Pandrowala, Vijaya Gowri, Mukesh Desai, Manasi Kulkarni, Gauri Hule, Umair Bargir, Priyanka Kambli, Manisha Madkaikar, Sagar Bhattad, Chetan Ginigeri, Harish Kumar, Ananthvikas Jayaram, Deenadayalan Munirathnam, Meena Sivasankaran, Revathi Raj, Ramya Uppuluri, Fouzia Na, Biju George, Harsha Prasada Lashkari, Manas Kalra, Anupam Sachdeva, Shishir Seth, Tapas Sabui, Aman Gupta, Karin van Leeuwen, Martin de Boer, Koon Wing Chan, Kohsuke Imai, Osamu Ohara, Shigeaki Nonoyama, Yu Lung Lau, Surjit Singh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Librarian | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 25% |
| Unknown | 19 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,236,238
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#8,153
of 31,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,835
of 451,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#399
of 1,226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.