↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Global Proteome and Lysine Acetylome Between Naive CD4+ T Cells and CD4+ T Follicular Helper Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Analysis of Global Proteome and Lysine Acetylome Between Naive CD4+ T Cells and CD4+ T Follicular Helper Cells
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2021
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2021.643441
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming Zhao, Sujie Jia, Xiaofei Gao, Hong Qiu, Ruifang Wu, Haijing Wu, Qianjin Lu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#16,059,145
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#16,731
of 31,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,247
of 453,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#749
of 1,338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.