↓ Skip to main content

Macrophages: The Good, the Bad, and the Gluttony

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Macrophages: The Good, the Bad, and the Gluttony
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, August 2021
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2021.708186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ewan A Ross, Andrew Devitt, Jill R Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 239 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 13%
Student > Master 25 10%
Researcher 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 3%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 102 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 108 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#10,792
of 31,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,508
of 436,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#464
of 1,354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.