You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Levels of soluble complement regulators predict severity of COVID-19 symptoms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1032331 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna L. Tierney, Wajd Mohammed Alali, Thomas Scott, Karen S. Rees-Unwin, CITIID-NIHR BioResource COVID-19 Collaboration, Simon J. Clark, Richard D. Unwin, Stephen Baker, John Bradley, Patrick Chinnery, Daniel Cooper, Gordon Dougan, Ian Goodfellow, Ravindra Gupta, Nathalie Kingston, Paul J. Lehner, Paul A. Lyons, Nicholas J. Matheson, Caroline Saunders, Kenneth G. C. Smith, Charlotte Summers, James Thaventhiran, M. Estee Torok, Mark R. Toshner, Michael P. Weekes, Gisele Alvio, Sharon Baker, Areti Bermperi, Karen Brookes, Ashlea Bucke, Jo Calder, Laura Canna, Cherry Crucusio, Isabel Cruz, Ranalie de Jesus, Katie Dempsey, Giovanni Di Stephano, Jason Domingo, Anne Elmer, Julie Harris, Sarah Hewitt, Heather Jones, Sherly Jose, Jane Kennet, Yvonne King, Jenny Kourampa, Emily Li, Caroline McMahon, Anne Meadows, Vivien Mendoza, Criona O’Brien, Charmain Ocaya, Ciro Pasquale, Marlyn Perales, Jane Price, Rebecca Rastall, Carla Ribeiro, Jane Rowlands, Valentina Ruffolo, Hugo Tordesillas, Phoebe Vargas, Bensi Vergese, Laura Watson, Jieniean Worsley, Julie-Ann Zerrudo, Laura Bergamashi, Ariana Betancourt, Georgie Bower, Ben Bullman, Chiara Cossetti, Aloka De Sa, Benjamin J. Dunmore, Maddie Epping, Stuart Fawke, Stefan Gräf, Richard Grenfell, Andrew Hinch, Josh Hodgson, Christopher Huang, Oisin Huhn, Kelvin Hunter, Isobel Jarvis, Emma Jones, Maša Josipović, Ekaterina Legchenko, Daniel Lewis, Joe Marsden, Jennifer Martin, Federica Mescia, Ciara O’Donnell, Ommar Omarjee, Marianne Perera, Linda Pointon, Nicole Pond, Nathan Richoz, Nika Romashova, Natalia Savoinykh, Rahul Sharma, Joy Shih, Mateusz Strezlecki, Rachel Sutcliffe, Tobias Tilly, Zhen Tong, Carmen Treacy, Lori Turner, Jennifer Wood, Marta Wylot, John Allison, Heather Biggs, John R. Bradley, Helen Butcher, Daniela Caputo, Matt Chandler, Patrick Chinnery, Debbie Clapham-Riley, Eleanor Dewhurst, Christian Fernandez, Anita Furlong, Barbara Graves, Jennifer Gray, Sabine Hein, Tasmin Ivers, Emma Le Gresley, Rachel Linger, Mary Kasanicki, Rebecca King, Nathalie Kingston, Sarah Meloy, Alexei Moulton, Francesca Muldoon, Nigel Ovington, Sofia Papadia, Christopher J. Penkett, Isabel Phelan, Venkatesh Ranganath, Roxana Paraschiv, Abigail Sage, Jennifer Sambrook, Ingrid Scholtes, Katherine Schon, Hannah Stark, Kathleen E. Stirrups, Paul Townsend, Neil Walker, Jennifer Webster, Mayurun Selvan, Petra Polgarova, Sarah L. Caddy, Laura G. Caller, Yasmin Chaudhry, Martin D. Curran, Theresa Feltwell, Stewart Fuller, Iliana Georgana, Grant Hall, William L. Hamilton, Myra Hosmillo, Charlotte J. Houldcroft, Rhys Izuagbe, Aminu S. Jahun, Fahad A. Khokhar, Anna G. Kovalenko, Luke W. Meredith, Surendra Parmar, Malte L. Pinckert, Anna Yakovleva, Emily C. Horner, Lucy Booth, Alexander Ferreira, Rebecca Boston, Robert Hughes, Juan Carlos Yam Puc, Nonantzin Beristain-Covarrubias, Maria Rust, Thevinya Gurugama, Lihinya Gurugama, Thomas Mulroney, Sarah Spencer, Zhaleh Hosseini, Kate Williamson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,769,979
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#4,237
of 32,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,791
of 442,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#188
of 1,940 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,940 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.