You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy and Safety of Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract in the Treatment of Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2022.891822 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liuting Zeng, Tiejun Yang, Kailin Yang, Ganpeng Yu, Jun Li, Wang Xiang, Hua Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| India | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 2 | 2% |
| Poland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 67 | 71% |
| Scientists | 13 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 43 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#390,779
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#382
of 32,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,276
of 435,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#25
of 2,015 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,015 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.