↓ Skip to main content

Persistent Antiphospholipid Antibodies Are Not Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes in a Prospective Cohort of Hospitalised Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Persistent Antiphospholipid Antibodies Are Not Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes in a Prospective Cohort of Hospitalised Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2022.911979
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerard Espinosa, Carles Zamora-Martínez, Albert Pérez-Isidro, Daniela Neto, Luz Yadira Bravo-Gallego, Sergio Prieto-González, Odette Viñas, Ana Belen Moreno-Castaño, Estíbaliz Ruiz-Ortiz, Ricard Cervera, The COVAPS-CLINIC Study Group Investigators, Alex Almuedo, Giuseppe Barilaro, Luz Yadira Bravo-Gallego, Daniel Camprubí, Júlia Calvo, Aina Capdevila-Reniu, Irene Carbonell, Ricard Cervera, Georgina Espígol-Frigolé, Gerard Espinosa, Cristina Gabara, Priscila Giavedoni, Ignacio Grafia, Andrea Ladino, Gema Maria Lledó-Ibáñez, Ana Matas-García, Pere Millat, Pedro Juan Moreno, Ana Belen Moreno-Castaño, Magdalena Muelas, José Muñoz, José Naval, Joan Padrosa, Martina Pellicé, María Jesús Pinazo, Sergio Prieto-González, Roberto Ríos-Garcés, Natalia Rodríguez, Olga Rodríguez-Núñez, Estibaliz Ruiz-Ortiz, Ruth Sotil, Adrià Tomé, Helena Ventosa, Odette Viñas, Carles Zamora-Martínez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 33%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,156,058
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#7,988
of 31,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,226
of 444,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#437
of 1,961 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,961 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.