You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Dysglycemia on Urinary Lipid Mediator Profiles in Persons With Pulmonary Tuberculosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2022.919802 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
María B. Arriaga, Farina Karim, Artur T.L. Queiroz, Mariana Araújo-Pereira, Beatriz Barreto-Duarte, Caio Sales, Mahomed-Yunus S. Moosa, Matilda Mazibuko, Ginger L. Milne, Fernanda Maruri, Carlos Henrique Serezani, John R. Koethe, Marina C. Figueiredo, Afrânio L. Kritski, Marcelo Cordeiro-Santos, Valeria C. Rolla, Timothy R. Sterling, Alasdair Leslie, Bruno B. Andrade, the RePORT Brazil and South Africa consortia, Alice M. S. Andrade, Michael S. Rocha, Vanessa Nascimento, Juan M. Cubillos-Angulo, Hayna Malta-Santos, Jéssica Rebouças-Silva, Sayonara M. Viana, Saulo R. N. Santos, André Ramos, Alysson G. Costa, Jaquelane Silva, Secretaria Jamile G. de Oliveira, Aline Benjamin, Adriano Gomes-Silva, Flavia M. Sant’Anna, Francine P. Ignácio, Maria Cristina Lourenço, Elisangela C. Silva, Adriana S. R. Moreira, Mayla Mello |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Researcher | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#16,063,069
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#16,731
of 31,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,585
of 437,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#1,054
of 2,021 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,021 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.