You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Functional reprogramming of peripheral blood monocytes by soluble mediators in patients with pancreatic cancer and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, July 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1116034 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Austin M. Eckhoff, Michael C. Brown, Karenia Landa, Ibtehaj Naqvi, Eda K. Holl, David Boczkowski, Ashley Fletcher, Kristen E. Rhodin, Minh Huy Giang, Bruce Sullenger, Georgia M. Beasley, Peter J. Allen, Smita K. Nair |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 57% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#6,570,243
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,985
of 31,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,452
of 359,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#167
of 1,190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.