↓ Skip to main content

Analyses of human vaccine-specific circulating and bone marrow-resident B cell populations reveal benefit of delayed vaccine booster dosing with blood-stage malaria antigens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analyses of human vaccine-specific circulating and bone marrow-resident B cell populations reveal benefit of delayed vaccine booster dosing with blood-stage malaria antigens
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1193079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordan R. Barrett, Sarah E. Silk, Catherine G. Mkindi, Karolina M. Kwiatkowska, Mimi M. Hou, Amelia M. Lias, Wilmina F. Kalinga, Ivanny M. Mtaka, Kirsty McHugh, Martino Bardelli, Hannah Davies, Lloyd D. W. King, Nick J. Edwards, Virander S. Chauhan, Paushali Mukherjee, Stella Rwezaula, Chetan E. Chitnis, Ally I. Olotu, Angela M. Minassian, Simon J. Draper, Carolyn M. Nielsen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#22,905,350
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#27,745
of 31,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,909
of 336,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#776
of 1,043 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,043 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.