You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Macrophage SREBP1 regulates skeletal muscle regeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1251784 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yumiko Oishi, Hiroyuki Koike, Naoki Kumagami, Yoshimi Nakagawa, Masaya Araki, Yoshitaka Taketomi, Yoshimi Miki, Shigeru Matsuda, Hyeree Kim, Takashi Matsuzaka, Hitoshi Ozawa, Hitoshi Shimano, Makoto Murakami, Ichiro Manabe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,011,775
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#25,248
of 32,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,859
of 355,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#682
of 1,049 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,049 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.