You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Circulating immunophenotypes are potentially prognostic in follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1325343 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anupam Kotwal, Michael P. Gustafson, Svetlana Bornschlegl, Allan B. Dietz, Danae Delivanis, Mabel Ryder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,876,193
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#9,218
of 32,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,700
of 349,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#173
of 1,060 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,060 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.