↓ Skip to main content

Diet-derived circulating antioxidants and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a Mendelian randomization study and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diet-derived circulating antioxidants and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a Mendelian randomization study and meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1334395
Pubmed ID
Authors

Menglong Zou, Qiaoli Liang, Wei Zhang, Junyao Liang, Ying Zhu, Yin Xu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,341,003
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#23,096
of 32,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,392
of 341,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#670
of 1,216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.