You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Single cell analysis revealed that two distinct, unique CD4+ T cell subsets were increased in the small intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes of aged mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1340048 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuki Yonemoto, Yasuhiro Nemoto, Ryo Morikawa, Nana Shibayama, Shigeru Oshima, Takashi Nagaishi, Tomohiro Mizutani, Go Ito, Satoru Fujii, Ryuichi Okamoto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 4 | 40% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,953,512
of 25,846,867 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,510
of 32,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,969
of 354,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#111
of 1,052 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,846,867 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,052 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.