↓ Skip to main content

Different evasion strategies in multiple myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different evasion strategies in multiple myeloma
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1346211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chaofan Wang, Wanting Wang, Moran Wang, Jun Deng, Chunyan Sun, Yu Hu, Shanshan Luo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,114,269
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#13,280
of 32,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,309
of 340,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#284
of 1,216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.