You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of anti-lymphocyte IgM autoantibodies driving complement activation in COVID-19 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1352330 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ainhoa Pérez-Díez, Xiangdong Liu, Stephanie Calderon, Ashlynn Bennett, Andrea Lisco, Anela Kellog, Frances Galindo, Matthew J. Memoli, Joseph M. Rocco, Brian P. Epling, Elizabeth Laidlaw, Mike C. Sneller, Maura Manion, Glenn W. Wortmann, Rita Poon, Princy Kumar, Irini Sereti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#23,214,800
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#28,086
of 32,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,906
of 225,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#481
of 878 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 878 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.