↓ Skip to main content

Role of innate T cells in necrotizing enterocolitis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of innate T cells in necrotizing enterocolitis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1357483
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianyun Liu, Sharon Joseph, Krishna Manohar, Jasmine Lee, John P. Brokaw, W. Christopher Shelley, Troy A. Markel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,987,537
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#15,667
of 32,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,877
of 345,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#335
of 1,102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.