↓ Skip to main content

Long noncoding RNAs and circular RNAs as potential diagnostic biomarkers of inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long noncoding RNAs and circular RNAs as potential diagnostic biomarkers of inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1362437
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melaku Ashagrie Belete, Selamyhun Tadesse, Mihret Tilahun, Alemu Gedefie, Agumas Shibabaw, Zewudu Mulatie, Muluken Amare Wudu, Saba Gebremichael, Habtu Debash, Mihreteab Alebachew, Ermiyas Alemayehu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,561,898
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#20,706
of 32,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,376
of 307,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#473
of 1,164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.