You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aberrant CD8+T cells drive reproductive dysfunction in female mice with elevated IFN-γ levels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1368572 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Enitome E. Bafor, Rebecca A. Erwin-Cohen, Toni Martin, Clayton Baker, Adrienne E. Kimmel, Olivier Duverger, John M. Fenimore, Meredith Ramba, Thea Spindel, Megan M. Hess, Michael Sanford, Vanja Lazarevic, Bérénice A. Benayoun, Howard A. Young, Julio C. Valencia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,077,334
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#18,766
of 32,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,078
of 223,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#249
of 878 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 878 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.