You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinicopathologic analysis of nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphomas, a multicenter retrospective study from China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1371534 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shanshan Ma, Suxiao Li, Xiaona Zuo, Wencai Li, Lifu Wang, Weiping Liu, Zhe Wang, Wei Sang, Yanjie Wang, Xudong Zhang, Mingzhi Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,321,269
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#23,066
of 32,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,173
of 285,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#472
of 1,100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.