You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Loss of TET2 increases B-1 cell number and IgM production while limiting CDR3 diversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1380641 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily Dennis, Maria Murach, Cassidy M.R. Blackburn, Melissa Marshall, Katherine Root, Tanyaporn Pattarabanjird, Justine Deroissart, Loren D. Erickson, Christoph J. Binder, Stefan Bekiranov, Coleen A. McNamara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 50% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Scientists | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,468,459
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#3,873
of 32,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,751
of 322,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#59
of 1,147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.