You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Conserving coral reef organisms that lack larval dispersal: are networks of Marine Protected Areas good enough?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2015.00016 |
Authors |
Paolo Momigliano, Robert Harcourt, Adam Stow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
Australia | 2 | 15% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 8% |
Japan | 1 | 8% |
Italy | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 7 | 54% |
Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 87 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 26 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 48% |
Environmental Science | 30 | 34% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 10 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,038,545
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#2,520
of 8,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,015
of 256,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.