↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: “Two new species of Echinoderes (Kinorhyncha: Cyclorhagida) from the Gulf of Mexico”

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: “Two new species of Echinoderes (Kinorhyncha: Cyclorhagida) from the Gulf of Mexico”
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2015.00043
Authors

Martin V. Sørensen, Stephen C. Landers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,411,569
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#6,745
of 8,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,403
of 266,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#27
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.