You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Individual-level Variation and Higher-level Interpretations of Space Use in Wide-ranging Species: An Albatross Case Study of Sampling Effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2015.00093 |
| Authors |
Sarah E. Gutowsky, Marty L. Leonard, Melinda G. Conners, Scott A. Shaffer, Ian D. Jonsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 27% |
| Researcher | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,422,194
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#1,666
of 9,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,338
of 284,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#5
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.