You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RecoMIA—Recommendations for Marine Image Annotation: Lessons Learned and Future Directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2016.00059 |
| Authors |
Timm Schoening, Jonas Osterloff, Tim W. Nattkemper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 21 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,538,491
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#4,065
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,304
of 315,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#29
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.