↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison between Four Analytical Methods for the Measurement of Fe(II) at Nanomolar Concentrations in Coastal Seawater

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparison between Four Analytical Methods for the Measurement of Fe(II) at Nanomolar Concentrations in Coastal Seawater
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, June 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2017.00192
Authors

Mark J. Hopwood, Antony J. Birchill, Martha Gledhill, Eric P. Achterberg, Jessica K. Klar, Angela Milne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 13%
Environmental Science 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,405,459
of 24,578,676 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#4,909
of 10,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,074
of 319,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#89
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,578,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.