You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrating Science-Based Co-management, Partnerships, Participatory Processes and Stewardship Incentives to Improve the Performance of Small-Scale Fisheries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2017.00345 |
| Authors |
Kendra A. Karr, Rod Fujita, Ramon Carcamo, Lawrence Epstein, James R. Foley, José A. Fraire-Cervantes, Mauro Gongora, Ollin T. Gonzalez-Cuellar, Pablo Granados-Dieseldorff, Julius Guirjen, Amy H. Weaver, Héctor Licón-González, Emilie Litsinger, Julio Maaz, Roquelito Mancao, Valerie Miller, Rafael Ortiz-Rodriguez, Tomás Plomozo-Lugo, Laura F. Rodriguez-Harker, Salvador Rodríguez-Van Dyck, Aristóteles Stavrinaky, Cristina Villanueva-Aznar, Beverly Wade, Daniel Whittle, Jacob P. Kritzer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 5 | 19% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 88% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 34 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,642,799
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#1,114
of 10,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,733
of 340,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#22
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.