You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding Diatom Cell Wall Silicification—Moving Forward
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2018.00125 |
| Authors |
Mark Hildebrand, Sarah J. L. Lerch, Roshan P. Shrestha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Japan | 2 | 11% |
| Philippines | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Scientists | 5 | 26% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 240 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 19% |
| Researcher | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 83 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 17 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 93 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,786,175
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#1,213
of 10,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,603
of 344,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#36
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.