You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advancing Marine Biological Observations and Data Requirements of the Complementary Essential Ocean Variables (EOVs) and Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) Frameworks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2018.00211 |
| Authors |
Frank E. Muller-Karger, Patricia Miloslavich, Nicholas J. Bax, Samantha Simmons, Mark J. Costello, Isabel Sousa Pinto, Gabrielle Canonico, Woody Turner, Michael Gill, Enrique Montes, Benjamin D. Best, Jay Pearlman, Patrick Halpin, Daniel Dunn, Abigail Benson, Corinne S. Martin, Lauren V. Weatherdon, Ward Appeltans, Pieter Provoost, Eduardo Klein, Christopher R. Kelble, Robert J. Miller, Francisco P. Chavez, Katrin Iken, Sanae Chiba, David Obura, Laetitia M. Navarro, Henrique M. Pereira, Valerie Allain, Sonia Batten, Lisandro Benedetti-Checchi, J. Emmett Duffy, Raphael M. Kudela, Lisa-Maria Rebelo, Yunne Shin, Gary Geller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 5 | 11% |
| Colombia | 3 | 7% |
| Belgium | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 76% |
| Scientists | 11 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 326 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 76 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Professor | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 15% |
| Unknown | 81 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 68 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 35 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 105 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,097,255
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#721
of 9,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,258
of 330,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#21
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.