You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting Optimal Sites for Ecosystem Restoration Using Stacked-Species Distribution Modeling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2019.00003 |
| Authors |
Amanda J. Zellmer, Jeremy T. Claisse, Chelsea M. Williams, Stuart Schwab, Daniel J. Pondella |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 55% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 16% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 41 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,263,466
of 24,914,266 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#3,174
of 10,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,420
of 458,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#101
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,914,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.