You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Time Scales of Benthic Macrofaunal Response to Pelagic Production Differ Between Major Feeding Groups
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2019.00015 |
| Authors |
Gennadi Lessin, Jorn Bruggeman, Caroline Louise McNeill, Stephen Widdicombe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,406,971
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#3,366
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,566
of 452,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#81
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.