↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Uncertainties in Scenario Simulations of Biogeochemical Cycles in the Baltic Sea

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of Uncertainties in Scenario Simulations of Biogeochemical Cycles in the Baltic Sea
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2019.00046
URN
urn:nbn:se:smhi:diva-5181
Authors

H. E. Markus Meier, Moa Edman, Kari Eilola, Manja Placke, Thomas Neumann, Helén C. Andersson, Sandra-Esther Brunnabend, Christian Dieterich, Claudia Frauen, René Friedland, Matthias Gröger, Bo G. Gustafsson, Erik Gustafsson, Alexey Isaev, Madline Kniebusch, Ivan Kuznetsov, Bärbel Müller-Karulis, Michael Naumann, Anders Omstedt, Vladimir Ryabchenko, Sofia Saraiva, Oleg P. Savchuk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 17%
Engineering 4 9%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#4,663
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,992
of 370,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#142
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.